Artist: Camel
Owned on digital media: Yes
Want to replace: N/A
The last Camel album on my list, their fourth album and the last to feature the original line-up. In listening to their stuff over again, I find it quite hard to decide on a favourite album of theirs in my admittedly limited collection (they released eight albums I've never heard).
Their third - Music inspired by The Snow Goose - was a favourite for some time even though it doesn't appear in this series of posts on account of me never having owned it on vinyl. It was the first Camel album I owned but I bought it on cassette tape and replaced it directly with the CD almost as soon as it came out. But now I find the typically haunting melodies and lyrics of Moonmadness are bewitching me again. This, along with Mirage, is rapidly becoming the Saturday morning music of choice, and particularly good for winding the wick up so I can still hear it over the sound of paper being scraped off the walls.
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
Back in the saddle
Seems like a long time since I did any serious writing. Novel #2 has been in the starting blocks for almost nine months but with only a little over 2000 words written it can hardly be said to have got started yet.
So I was grateful for a link from a mate at the end of last week, pointing me in the direction of a Manchester-based writing competition that closes on Friday of this week. Luckily - in view of the extremely short deadline - it's a *short* story competition. No more than 3,000 words and on any topic at all as long as it reflects city life in some way, and the city of Manchester in particular plays "a central role" in the story.
Always a good sign when an idea pops into one's head straight away, which is exactly what happened to me as I flicked through the competition rules. I'm on to the second draft now, and really pleased with the idea I've come up with for the ending. The short story is a form I'm entirely unfamiliar with, as a writer not a reader, although I have read the odd article on the particular challenges faced by short story writers. I refreshed my memory of those over the weekend in a couple of stints of Internet research, interspersed with actual writing. I know myself well enough not to fall into the trap of spending all my time reading about the good practice and no time on the actual doing.
Winners are announced at the beginning of August so that's another bonus - I don't have to sit around for weeks wondering how I've done. Always the worst part.
So I was grateful for a link from a mate at the end of last week, pointing me in the direction of a Manchester-based writing competition that closes on Friday of this week. Luckily - in view of the extremely short deadline - it's a *short* story competition. No more than 3,000 words and on any topic at all as long as it reflects city life in some way, and the city of Manchester in particular plays "a central role" in the story.
Always a good sign when an idea pops into one's head straight away, which is exactly what happened to me as I flicked through the competition rules. I'm on to the second draft now, and really pleased with the idea I've come up with for the ending. The short story is a form I'm entirely unfamiliar with, as a writer not a reader, although I have read the odd article on the particular challenges faced by short story writers. I refreshed my memory of those over the weekend in a couple of stints of Internet research, interspersed with actual writing. I know myself well enough not to fall into the trap of spending all my time reading about the good practice and no time on the actual doing.
Winners are announced at the beginning of August so that's another bonus - I don't have to sit around for weeks wondering how I've done. Always the worst part.
Monday, June 28, 2010
Blattered but not Broken
Sepp Blatter has been conspicuous by his absence since Sunday afternoon. Calls for his resignation, or at least a reconsideration of his ridiculous policy not to allow goal line technology to be introduced in international competition, have been legion.
His arguments - that football is "a human game that contains human mistakes" - sound like something you'd hear in an Amish community hall. Tennis too, is a human game, but the number of human errors has been greatly reduced with the use of HawkEye electronic line judging to supplement - not replace - its human counterparts, and avoid the kind of glaring error of judgement or momentary lapse in concentration that marred Sunday's England v Germany fixture. Cricket too has seen HawkEye deployed to assist the umpires. So why is football - the most ubiquitous game on the planet and a multi-billion-dollar industry - kept in the dark ages by a ruling body who remain inexpicably and embarrassingly unmoved by two examples of refereeing incompetence in a single dismal day.
Closing your eyes, ears and heart to the march of technology in the name of keeping the game "pure" is like saying that writers should continue to use quill pens, or DNA evidence can't be used in criminal law, or policemen should continue to rely on whistles and truncheons, eschewing radios, tazers and patrol cars. Technological advances are there to help humans achieve their highest ambitions, not replace them.
It's simply beyond belief that we even have to have the debate. The correct decision is so obvious. I'm not saying we would have won if the half-time scoreline had been, correctly, 2-2. But there can be no doubting that the decision to disallow a perfectly good equaliser took the wind out of England's sails. Even though they were outclassed for most of the game by a fitter, younger and far hungrier German side, we had already proved we could score 2 to match their 2, and the demoralising effect of having one of those two snatched away simply because the officials could not do their jobs properly should not be underestimated. At least, if we're going to get totally slaughtered, let's have the scoreline reflecting the number of goals actually scored.
His arguments - that football is "a human game that contains human mistakes" - sound like something you'd hear in an Amish community hall. Tennis too, is a human game, but the number of human errors has been greatly reduced with the use of HawkEye electronic line judging to supplement - not replace - its human counterparts, and avoid the kind of glaring error of judgement or momentary lapse in concentration that marred Sunday's England v Germany fixture. Cricket too has seen HawkEye deployed to assist the umpires. So why is football - the most ubiquitous game on the planet and a multi-billion-dollar industry - kept in the dark ages by a ruling body who remain inexpicably and embarrassingly unmoved by two examples of refereeing incompetence in a single dismal day.
Closing your eyes, ears and heart to the march of technology in the name of keeping the game "pure" is like saying that writers should continue to use quill pens, or DNA evidence can't be used in criminal law, or policemen should continue to rely on whistles and truncheons, eschewing radios, tazers and patrol cars. Technological advances are there to help humans achieve their highest ambitions, not replace them.
It's simply beyond belief that we even have to have the debate. The correct decision is so obvious. I'm not saying we would have won if the half-time scoreline had been, correctly, 2-2. But there can be no doubting that the decision to disallow a perfectly good equaliser took the wind out of England's sails. Even though they were outclassed for most of the game by a fitter, younger and far hungrier German side, we had already proved we could score 2 to match their 2, and the demoralising effect of having one of those two snatched away simply because the officials could not do their jobs properly should not be underestimated. At least, if we're going to get totally slaughtered, let's have the scoreline reflecting the number of goals actually scored.
Thursday, June 24, 2010
This guy doesn't need my help, but...
...even so, I'm going to point you at him.
About a week ago Nikki found Stuff No-One Told Me (But I Learned Anyway) - a new blog by Spanish artist Alex Noriega.
I don't read many blogs, and I can't remember ever having recommended one before, but Alex has lit a small fire on the Internet with his witty, perceptive and well-drawn cartoons about life and I wanted to share. In the 7 days since I've been reading it, his followers have jumped from about 150 to 1573 and in the way of Internet phenomena I'm certain that number will continue to explode as word gets around.
Today's cartoon is one of his best yet:
but my personal favourite is still number 15. Number 09 is pretty cool too. I'm sure you'll have your own.
About a week ago Nikki found Stuff No-One Told Me (But I Learned Anyway) - a new blog by Spanish artist Alex Noriega.
I don't read many blogs, and I can't remember ever having recommended one before, but Alex has lit a small fire on the Internet with his witty, perceptive and well-drawn cartoons about life and I wanted to share. In the 7 days since I've been reading it, his followers have jumped from about 150 to 1573 and in the way of Internet phenomena I'm certain that number will continue to explode as word gets around.
Today's cartoon is one of his best yet:
but my personal favourite is still number 15. Number 09 is pretty cool too. I'm sure you'll have your own.
Monday, June 21, 2010
The final forty
After more than ten weeks of voting, using one scheme or another, polls finally closed on Saturday night, and the last four acts to join the 36 announced over previous weeks learned that they'd managed to sneak in as the door was closing on Storm the Charts 2010.
As I mentioned last week, I've been keeping count. What seems like years ago, as the acts were announced on the catalogue pages, I spent these early mornings listening to the music and noting down whether I liked it or not.
In the way of notes that are not intended for public consumption, some of my comments were a little... raw. Others gushed. Those early notes were on paper (I printed off the catalogue pages as they grew) and when I found a track I really liked, I'd draw a box around it so I'd be able to find it again easily if and when it came time to download. As the days went on I fell into a pattern of writing an X against those tracks I thought were really bad, and a Y for the good ones (that weren't good enough to merit a box). As the list careered towards its final total of 568 artists I invented another category - YY - for stuff that I appreciated was *really* good but not the kind of thing I'd want to download.
So in this rather unscientific and piecemeal way I arrived at a place where I'd defined five categories: X (crap); Y (good); YY (very good); boxed (excellent); and the rest, which didn't make enough of an impression on me, either way, to have any mark at all. A kind of "meh" category. And what, you might be wondering, does the final forty look like when it's Diggered™? Well, it looks like this.
Which, if it says anything at all, probably says "John's musical tastes are somewhat at odds with the mainstream."
So it's talking a lot of sense, because I can't stand rap, or hip hop, or anything like it. Not too keen on most R&B either. I could go on. But that small and perfectly formed green wedge in the pie - the tracks with the boxes - represents eight songs that I will be downloading from next Sunday. An investment of something like six quid and if any of them gets anywhere near the top 40 I'll be well chuffed. And so will they, probably.
As I mentioned last week, I've been keeping count. What seems like years ago, as the acts were announced on the catalogue pages, I spent these early mornings listening to the music and noting down whether I liked it or not.
In the way of notes that are not intended for public consumption, some of my comments were a little... raw. Others gushed. Those early notes were on paper (I printed off the catalogue pages as they grew) and when I found a track I really liked, I'd draw a box around it so I'd be able to find it again easily if and when it came time to download. As the days went on I fell into a pattern of writing an X against those tracks I thought were really bad, and a Y for the good ones (that weren't good enough to merit a box). As the list careered towards its final total of 568 artists I invented another category - YY - for stuff that I appreciated was *really* good but not the kind of thing I'd want to download.
So in this rather unscientific and piecemeal way I arrived at a place where I'd defined five categories: X (crap); Y (good); YY (very good); boxed (excellent); and the rest, which didn't make enough of an impression on me, either way, to have any mark at all. A kind of "meh" category. And what, you might be wondering, does the final forty look like when it's Diggered™? Well, it looks like this.
Which, if it says anything at all, probably says "John's musical tastes are somewhat at odds with the mainstream."
So it's talking a lot of sense, because I can't stand rap, or hip hop, or anything like it. Not too keen on most R&B either. I could go on. But that small and perfectly formed green wedge in the pie - the tracks with the boxes - represents eight songs that I will be downloading from next Sunday. An investment of something like six quid and if any of them gets anywhere near the top 40 I'll be well chuffed. And so will they, probably.
Sunday, June 20, 2010
Vinyl: I Can See Your House From Here
Artist: Camel
Owned on digital media: No
Want to replace: Yes
The completist in me shows through on this one, because my only reason for wanting to replace this album is my certainty of Camel fandom. I like their music, so I'm guessing that once upon a time I liked this album, although I have absolutely no memory of it, even after looking at the track list on Wikipedia.
Another one of those old albums that's sat gathering dust under the stairs for three years, and was never played in our previous house either. What's more, I don't remember having seen a remastered copy in any of the music shops, although it's available on Amazon and even has a couple of reasonable reviews.
Saturday, June 19, 2010
Utter shite would have been an improvement
I'm the first to admit I don't know anything about football. I don't follow a league (is it even called the league any more? Premiership? Whatever) team, I'm terminally bored by office football pundits, TV football pundits, footballers, footballers' wives, football hooligans and... well... you get the picture.
But come on. It's the World Cup. Once every four years even I can try to get a bit excited about the beautiful game. Except there wasn't much beautiful about it last night.
In one of those rare minutes of the 90 where I found my attention wandering from the pitch (*cough*), I began wondering exactly how much money there was running around aimlessly, failing to make, or receive, the simplest of passes, constantly passing back, waiting for other players (including Algerian ones) to catch up, not shooting, not tackling, not really doing much of anything apart from collecting their vastly inflated salaries.
So I've done some research. Ignoring substitutions and going with the starting lineup, here's what I found.
01 James. Signed for Portsmouth in 2006 for £1.2m. Salary said to be £65,000 per week.
02 G Johnson. Signed for Liverpool in 2009 for £18m. £139k per week
03 Ashley Cole. Chelsea paid £25m for him in 2006. £120kpw
06 Terry. Never moved from Chelsea but Man City offered £50m in 2009. £135kpw
18 Carragher. Never moved from Liverpool and no transfer value or offers found. Using his salary (£75kpw) as a comparator, he'd probably fetch something like £4m on the market.
04 Gerrard. Never moved from Liverpool but Real Madrid rumoured to have bid £85m. £125kpw+
07 Lennon. Signed for Spurs in 2005 for £1m. His last posted salary of £20kpw was improved in 2009 but no figure given.
08 Lampard. Chelsea bought him for £11m in 2001 but there is a more recent Real Madrid rumour of £30m. One of the highest paid in the premiership at £151kpw
14 Barry. A Man City signing in 2009 for £12m. £120kpw
10 Rooney. Signed for Man U in 2004 for £25.6m. His £115kpw is due for review, some say it's set to rise to at least 140kpw, and his transfer value is estimated to be on a par with Ronaldo (£80m)
21 Heskey. Bought by Aston Villa in 2009 for £3.5m (less than his previous two transfers, which probably explains his relatively low salary of around £50kpw).
So there you have it. At conservative estimates, given that many of these numbers are years out of date, the England players on the field yesterday are worth almost THREE HUNDRED AND TEN MILLION POUNDS and between them they earn £1.14 million per week.
Now I know that footballing isn't a 40-hour per week job, and that rates of pay for playing for England differ from "the day job" but assuming it was, and it didn't, then for the 90 minute total shambles we witnessed on Friday 18 June 2010, these "professional" "footballers" earned a total of £42,750. That's about one-and-a-half times the average UK ANNUAL salary.
Worth every penny, I'd say. If you paid me to say it, that is.
But come on. It's the World Cup. Once every four years even I can try to get a bit excited about the beautiful game. Except there wasn't much beautiful about it last night.
In one of those rare minutes of the 90 where I found my attention wandering from the pitch (*cough*), I began wondering exactly how much money there was running around aimlessly, failing to make, or receive, the simplest of passes, constantly passing back, waiting for other players (including Algerian ones) to catch up, not shooting, not tackling, not really doing much of anything apart from collecting their vastly inflated salaries.
So I've done some research. Ignoring substitutions and going with the starting lineup, here's what I found.
01 James. Signed for Portsmouth in 2006 for £1.2m. Salary said to be £65,000 per week.
02 G Johnson. Signed for Liverpool in 2009 for £18m. £139k per week
03 Ashley Cole. Chelsea paid £25m for him in 2006. £120kpw
06 Terry. Never moved from Chelsea but Man City offered £50m in 2009. £135kpw
18 Carragher. Never moved from Liverpool and no transfer value or offers found. Using his salary (£75kpw) as a comparator, he'd probably fetch something like £4m on the market.
04 Gerrard. Never moved from Liverpool but Real Madrid rumoured to have bid £85m. £125kpw+
07 Lennon. Signed for Spurs in 2005 for £1m. His last posted salary of £20kpw was improved in 2009 but no figure given.
08 Lampard. Chelsea bought him for £11m in 2001 but there is a more recent Real Madrid rumour of £30m. One of the highest paid in the premiership at £151kpw
14 Barry. A Man City signing in 2009 for £12m. £120kpw
10 Rooney. Signed for Man U in 2004 for £25.6m. His £115kpw is due for review, some say it's set to rise to at least 140kpw, and his transfer value is estimated to be on a par with Ronaldo (£80m)
21 Heskey. Bought by Aston Villa in 2009 for £3.5m (less than his previous two transfers, which probably explains his relatively low salary of around £50kpw).
So there you have it. At conservative estimates, given that many of these numbers are years out of date, the England players on the field yesterday are worth almost THREE HUNDRED AND TEN MILLION POUNDS and between them they earn £1.14 million per week.
Now I know that footballing isn't a 40-hour per week job, and that rates of pay for playing for England differ from "the day job" but assuming it was, and it didn't, then for the 90 minute total shambles we witnessed on Friday 18 June 2010, these "professional" "footballers" earned a total of £42,750. That's about one-and-a-half times the average UK ANNUAL salary.
Worth every penny, I'd say. If you paid me to say it, that is.
Friday, June 18, 2010
Yours for only £12.99
Along with most of the (Internet enabled) planet, I'm guessing, I get spammed regularly by Universal Online Retailers Inc. (aka Play.com, Amazon, etc) with offers of stuff their "clever" algorithms have decided I'll be interested in.
I say spammed, but I'll admit in this case it's partly my own fault for, you know, shopping there. I do take exception to the notion that if you've ever, even once, bought a vampire movie then you're bound to be interested in every other vampire, near-vampire, or teen-vampire movie, or anything with characters similar to "vamp" or "pire" in the title, genre, plot description, crew or cast.
Partly because I'm lazy, partly because it's easier to just delete them, and partly because I'm an eternal optimist who believes that in among the dross will one day sparkle an irresistible gem, I remain subscribed to these emails and occasionally, when the morning crop is a bit thinon the ground in the Inbox, I read one.
Today was one such day. And what I saw was more frightening than the goriest schlock horror film ever produced.
A 3-disc boxed set of... the 2010 Eurovision Song Contest.
I mean, come on. It's bad enough watching the crap the first time through. Who the hell would PAY to watch it again? To be able to watch it again whenever they want? Weird.
I say spammed, but I'll admit in this case it's partly my own fault for, you know, shopping there. I do take exception to the notion that if you've ever, even once, bought a vampire movie then you're bound to be interested in every other vampire, near-vampire, or teen-vampire movie, or anything with characters similar to "vamp" or "pire" in the title, genre, plot description, crew or cast.
Partly because I'm lazy, partly because it's easier to just delete them, and partly because I'm an eternal optimist who believes that in among the dross will one day sparkle an irresistible gem, I remain subscribed to these emails and occasionally, when the morning crop is a bit thin
Today was one such day. And what I saw was more frightening than the goriest schlock horror film ever produced.
A 3-disc boxed set of... the 2010 Eurovision Song Contest.
I mean, come on. It's bad enough watching the crap the first time through. Who the hell would PAY to watch it again? To be able to watch it again whenever they want? Weird.
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
Stop worrying
The "Quote of the Day" widget on my Google homepage regularly gives me a smile. Occasionally a laugh. All too rarely it delivers something so appropriate, so timely, all I can do is listen to the sound of my jaw dropping while I sit immobilised at the keyboard.
Whoever ceases to be a student has never been a student.
-George Iles
So I'll stop worrying that I'm 53 years old and I still live in a house where half the rooms (including our bedroom) have no carpet. Where half-completed construction projects shed their dust (it's a SIN!) over the entire house. Where my tools litter the study floor alongside the disassembled pieces of that rim latch I was saving for when I repair the door on the spare room. Where the attic is stuffed with things of almost no perceptible value, which I can't bring myself to chuck out in case someone will offer me a few measly quid for them on eBay.
Assuming I ever got around to listing them there.
It used to scare me - a little - how much this house resembles the digs I had as a student. It's even in the same road (albeit the nicer end, I tell myself). But, you know, it's a home. I like it. Love it, actually. And it does get better, slowly. Or "at my own pace" as I prefer to put it.
It's a place where there's always time for a laugh, or a cup of tea. Time for a leisurely breakfast, a game of Buzz, or a movie. And where I never need to feel pressured to DO anything, or guilty that I haven't.
Yeah. In the words of a popular icon from my youth: "What, me worry?"
Whoever ceases to be a student has never been a student.
-George Iles
So I'll stop worrying that I'm 53 years old and I still live in a house where half the rooms (including our bedroom) have no carpet. Where half-completed construction projects shed their dust (it's a SIN!) over the entire house. Where my tools litter the study floor alongside the disassembled pieces of that rim latch I was saving for when I repair the door on the spare room. Where the attic is stuffed with things of almost no perceptible value, which I can't bring myself to chuck out in case someone will offer me a few measly quid for them on eBay.
Assuming I ever got around to listing them there.
It used to scare me - a little - how much this house resembles the digs I had as a student. It's even in the same road (albeit the nicer end, I tell myself). But, you know, it's a home. I like it. Love it, actually. And it does get better, slowly. Or "at my own pace" as I prefer to put it.
It's a place where there's always time for a laugh, or a cup of tea. Time for a leisurely breakfast, a game of Buzz, or a movie. And where I never need to feel pressured to DO anything, or guilty that I haven't.
Yeah. In the words of a popular icon from my youth: "What, me worry?"
Monday, June 14, 2010
Earlier this month
I lost a spreadsheet today.
I've been keeping track of the artists selected to Storm the Charts at the end of this month and having had an Excel blitz at the end of last week it had dropped off my MRU list. No problem obviously, I'll just open up the folder where I keep all my spreadsheets...
Oh.
Ah! Must've saved it in my "reference" folder.
Um...
OK, how about the folder where I keep everything to do with StC (not to mention the Weird & Wonderful files)?
Nope.
OK, well there's still nowt to worry about (right?) because I've got the good ol' Windows Search facility. Now I *know* I edited this file last week to add the four artists that were chosen last Sunday, so what kind of date filter do I need? Ah yes, here's a handy-dandy one called "files that were edited earlier this month" and I *know* it'll be on my data drive somewhere, so I'll just search the whole damn drive for anything that's been edited "earlier this month."
Er... Shit. Where is it? Not there, apparently. Which is mad, because I know it's there. It was there last week. Everything else is there. Why isn't this there? It has to be there.
So hang on, cos I haven't used Windows Search ON WINDOWS 7 before. And it looks like there's this cool date widget that I can drag across and select "anything that's changed between June 1 and June 14"
Holy Crap!! That's about ten times more files than my first search found! And... yes! There's my spreadsheet! (breathe small sigh of relief). Last edited on... Monday morning.
OK I have to ask. In what dark festering corner of the entire universe is "earlier this month" NOT THE SAME THING as "between June 1 and June 14" ???
I've been keeping track of the artists selected to Storm the Charts at the end of this month and having had an Excel blitz at the end of last week it had dropped off my MRU list. No problem obviously, I'll just open up the folder where I keep all my spreadsheets...
Oh.
Ah! Must've saved it in my "reference" folder.
Um...
OK, how about the folder where I keep everything to do with StC (not to mention the Weird & Wonderful files)?
Nope.
OK, well there's still nowt to worry about (right?) because I've got the good ol' Windows Search facility. Now I *know* I edited this file last week to add the four artists that were chosen last Sunday, so what kind of date filter do I need? Ah yes, here's a handy-dandy one called "files that were edited earlier this month" and I *know* it'll be on my data drive somewhere, so I'll just search the whole damn drive for anything that's been edited "earlier this month."
Er... Shit. Where is it? Not there, apparently. Which is mad, because I know it's there. It was there last week. Everything else is there. Why isn't this there? It has to be there.
So hang on, cos I haven't used Windows Search ON WINDOWS 7 before. And it looks like there's this cool date widget that I can drag across and select "anything that's changed between June 1 and June 14"
Holy Crap!! That's about ten times more files than my first search found! And... yes! There's my spreadsheet! (breathe small sigh of relief). Last edited on... Monday morning.
OK I have to ask. In what dark festering corner of the entire universe is "earlier this month" NOT THE SAME THING as "between June 1 and June 14" ???
Sunday, June 13, 2010
Vinyl: Mirage
Artist: Camel
Owned on digital media: Yes
Want to replace: N/A
Probably my favourite of all the Camel albums I owned, either on digital or vinyl. Includes classic tracks like Mystic Queen ("have you seen the mystic queen, riding in her limousine?"), and the epic Lady Fantasy and Nimrodel/The Procession/The White Rider, which has a Lord of the Rings theme.
It also heavily features Andrew Latimer playing one of my most favourite instruments of all time - the flute. So, adding all this together - flute music, Lord of the Rings, fantasy - what's not to like? Easy to see why I've already replaced it.
Owned on digital media: Yes
Want to replace: N/A
Probably my favourite of all the Camel albums I owned, either on digital or vinyl. Includes classic tracks like Mystic Queen ("have you seen the mystic queen, riding in her limousine?"), and the epic Lady Fantasy and Nimrodel/The Procession/The White Rider, which has a Lord of the Rings theme.
It also heavily features Andrew Latimer playing one of my most favourite instruments of all time - the flute. So, adding all this together - flute music, Lord of the Rings, fantasy - what's not to like? Easy to see why I've already replaced it.
Saturday, June 12, 2010
The future's bleak; the future's Bleakley
Warning: rant coming.
In the news recently, speculation that Christine Bleakley is on the verge of signing a new 2-year deal with the BBC worth £1million. An increase of £100,000 a year over her current pay. Shortly after that, news that Bleakley had issued a statement denying this rumour, and stating that she had received offers from both BBC and ITV and was "torn."
Until a couple of weeks ago, my impression of Bleakley was based entirely on her 2008 appearance on Strictly Come Dancing. Personable enough. Made an effort to learn the dances. Usual media speculation about romantic entanglements with her partner. I never watched her on The One Show because I couldn't (still can't) stand her sidekick Adrian Chiles. A talentless buffoon hiding behind faux blokey "charm" who could get right up my nose within milliseconds of being subjected to his pudgy face spouting inanities in a Brummie accent.
Since Chiles left, we've risked the odd half-hour with The One Show. Bland pap for the early evening, when the schedulers must think everyone's rushing to cook and scarf their evening meals in between the regional news and the soaps, and anyone left watching will be easily entertained with a few talking heads and content-free general interest stories.
So has my impression of Christine changed since I've watched her in her natural habitat? Not really. To be honest I can't see what all the fuss is about. She looks relatively pretty, sits on a sofa, smiles and reads an autocue. In a Northern Irish accent, which for some reason virtually guarantees that media luvvies will be falling over themselves to give her air time. Can't understand the attraction myself, but each to his own.
So nurses are worth something like 20 grand a year, police and firemen a bit more. But if you're a vacuous bimbo who can smile and read at the same time, you can get a job with the Beeb and be paid half a MILLION pounds a year. Of our money.
Oh no, sorry. To be entirely accurate you can WRING YOUR HANDS and be publicly "TORN" about whether you want to accept the offer of half a million pounds, or whether you'd rather run off to the competition for probably a bit MORE dosh, and the chance to once again share the same sofa with an old mate.
I must be missing something, but what is it she actually does that is so difficult? I'm experiencing that stress that one gets when the perceived value of something doesn't match the actual money involved. Let's just hope that the BBC aren't sucked into a bidding war for this non-entity. If she decides to go, let her. If ITV think she's worth more than half a million a year, and their advertising revenues can stand it - with people deserting the channel in their millions and those still watching fast-forwarding through the ads with their PVRs - let them have her. It's June, and university finals are finishing all over the country. Within a few weeks there'll be hundreds of media studies, journalism, drama, and similar graduates tipping out onto the job market. I'd wager there's at least a dozen in that bunch who are (a) as attractive as Bleakley; (b) can read; and (c) would jump at the chance to take her place for one-tenth of the wedge she's on.
In the news recently, speculation that Christine Bleakley is on the verge of signing a new 2-year deal with the BBC worth £1million. An increase of £100,000 a year over her current pay. Shortly after that, news that Bleakley had issued a statement denying this rumour, and stating that she had received offers from both BBC and ITV and was "torn."
Until a couple of weeks ago, my impression of Bleakley was based entirely on her 2008 appearance on Strictly Come Dancing. Personable enough. Made an effort to learn the dances. Usual media speculation about romantic entanglements with her partner. I never watched her on The One Show because I couldn't (still can't) stand her sidekick Adrian Chiles. A talentless buffoon hiding behind faux blokey "charm" who could get right up my nose within milliseconds of being subjected to his pudgy face spouting inanities in a Brummie accent.
Since Chiles left, we've risked the odd half-hour with The One Show. Bland pap for the early evening, when the schedulers must think everyone's rushing to cook and scarf their evening meals in between the regional news and the soaps, and anyone left watching will be easily entertained with a few talking heads and content-free general interest stories.
So has my impression of Christine changed since I've watched her in her natural habitat? Not really. To be honest I can't see what all the fuss is about. She looks relatively pretty, sits on a sofa, smiles and reads an autocue. In a Northern Irish accent, which for some reason virtually guarantees that media luvvies will be falling over themselves to give her air time. Can't understand the attraction myself, but each to his own.
So nurses are worth something like 20 grand a year, police and firemen a bit more. But if you're a vacuous bimbo who can smile and read at the same time, you can get a job with the Beeb and be paid half a MILLION pounds a year. Of our money.
Oh no, sorry. To be entirely accurate you can WRING YOUR HANDS and be publicly "TORN" about whether you want to accept the offer of half a million pounds, or whether you'd rather run off to the competition for probably a bit MORE dosh, and the chance to once again share the same sofa with an old mate.
I must be missing something, but what is it she actually does that is so difficult? I'm experiencing that stress that one gets when the perceived value of something doesn't match the actual money involved. Let's just hope that the BBC aren't sucked into a bidding war for this non-entity. If she decides to go, let her. If ITV think she's worth more than half a million a year, and their advertising revenues can stand it - with people deserting the channel in their millions and those still watching fast-forwarding through the ads with their PVRs - let them have her. It's June, and university finals are finishing all over the country. Within a few weeks there'll be hundreds of media studies, journalism, drama, and similar graduates tipping out onto the job market. I'd wager there's at least a dozen in that bunch who are (a) as attractive as Bleakley; (b) can read; and (c) would jump at the chance to take her place for one-tenth of the wedge she's on.
Friday, June 11, 2010
There but for the grace of God...
The first funeral was held yesterday for one of the victims of the Cumbrian shootings. It was attended by one of Nikki's colleagues and took place in the sleepy Lake District town of Gosforth.
Some news items swim past, barely touching the surface of our consciousness. So many horrors in the world, so regularly delivered to our living rooms, if we gave them all full heart we'd be constantly ragged with emotion, enraged at our inability to help, railing ineffectually at the perpetrators (if human) or the universe (if natural).
This story though, has a special and chilling significance for us. It is only five weeks since I stood outside the local general store in Gosforth, not 100 yards from where that young man was randomly gunned down. Had we taken our holiday five weeks later, or had Bird gone on his mad spree five weeks earlier, we could so easily have been involved. As eye witnesses, or as victims.
Twice in that idyllic week we spent in the Lakes I drove alone to the shop first thing in the morning for breakfast supplies. And on at least two other occasions, we both attended the store. In uncountable ways, life is a matter of timing, and had our timing been off in this respect, I might never have returned to the cottage, leaving Nikki wondering where on Earth I'd got to, or we both might not have come back from the Lakes.
In nearby Seascale, where another two murders were committed, we spent a couple of hours walking on the beach, picking up pebbles, breathing the sea air, enjoying the view and exchanging polite "Good mornings" with the few other people on the beach. The thought that one of those we encountered could have been carrying a gun with intent to use it on whomever he met, still sends involuntary shivers through me.
The natural desire for retribution, or at the very least for an explanation, is so often thwarted in cases like this after the gunman turns his weapon on himself at the last. Those directly involved are left without an outlet for their anger or grief, staring down their own barrel: a lifetime of anguish and loss. And for the rest of us, for a time, the stark realisation that these terrible incidents can happen anywhere, at any time, without either meaning or warning, is enough to account for some restless dreams.
Some news items swim past, barely touching the surface of our consciousness. So many horrors in the world, so regularly delivered to our living rooms, if we gave them all full heart we'd be constantly ragged with emotion, enraged at our inability to help, railing ineffectually at the perpetrators (if human) or the universe (if natural).
This story though, has a special and chilling significance for us. It is only five weeks since I stood outside the local general store in Gosforth, not 100 yards from where that young man was randomly gunned down. Had we taken our holiday five weeks later, or had Bird gone on his mad spree five weeks earlier, we could so easily have been involved. As eye witnesses, or as victims.
Twice in that idyllic week we spent in the Lakes I drove alone to the shop first thing in the morning for breakfast supplies. And on at least two other occasions, we both attended the store. In uncountable ways, life is a matter of timing, and had our timing been off in this respect, I might never have returned to the cottage, leaving Nikki wondering where on Earth I'd got to, or we both might not have come back from the Lakes.
In nearby Seascale, where another two murders were committed, we spent a couple of hours walking on the beach, picking up pebbles, breathing the sea air, enjoying the view and exchanging polite "Good mornings" with the few other people on the beach. The thought that one of those we encountered could have been carrying a gun with intent to use it on whomever he met, still sends involuntary shivers through me.
The natural desire for retribution, or at the very least for an explanation, is so often thwarted in cases like this after the gunman turns his weapon on himself at the last. Those directly involved are left without an outlet for their anger or grief, staring down their own barrel: a lifetime of anguish and loss. And for the rest of us, for a time, the stark realisation that these terrible incidents can happen anywhere, at any time, without either meaning or warning, is enough to account for some restless dreams.
Thursday, June 10, 2010
The YouTube generation
You'll be surprised to learn that it's common practice to decamp to one of the local ale houses following any (and all) Chorlton Players' performance(s). So it was that I found myself stood outside on the "porch" of The Bar clutching a pint of Alchemist's on Thursday last.
The evening began in unassuming fashion, but turned rapidly surreal as we watched a woman dressed in a leopard skin outfit drive a disabled cart determinedly across the road towards a waiting taxi. It seemed a dangerous manoeuvre, it being dark, the cart having no lights, and the road outside The Bar - passing as it does over the railway - being effectively on the brow of a hill. Still, she made it alright, and the taxi driver got out to help her into the cab (or so we thought), so we turned back to our drinks and our conversations expecting that to be the end of it.
How wrong we were.
A few minutes later, someone called out "oh my God! Look at her!" Far from alighting the cab and leaving, the woman was now holding up the traffic. Facing the cart the wrong way down our side of the road, she drove it from side to side in a kind of mad, figure-of-eight dance, narrowly missing the headlights of the first car in a queue of about ten that she was preventing from making any progress down the road.
The cab driver decided he didn't want to know, did a U-ey and headed back into Chorlton centre.
That was the start of an interesting half-hour during which this lady, who was clearly inebriated, high, mentally disturbed or a combination of all three, drove maniacally around on the open road, or the pavements, alternately stopping vehicular or pedestrian traffic. When, eventually, a man intervened to try and steer the cart to safety, she beat him around the head, and then got out of the cart and chased him down the road!
So. Not disabled then. No. It wasn't even a real disabled buggy. When it passed us at close range we realised it was a disabled person's shopping trolley, the "Asda" emblem clearly visible on the side. As the nearest Asda is in Hulme she'd done pretty well to navigate the thing from there to here, especially in her... incapacitated... state.
Eventually someone called the police, but they didn't seem especially interested in her or her behaviour. Not the theft of the trolley or the multiple traffic offences she must have committed, or even any kind of breach of the peace (she'd had minor altercations with several bystanders by this point).
But the most surprising and disturbing thing of all, for me, was the reaction of the overwhelming majority of onlookers.
Did they try to help her?
No!
Protect her?
No!
Warn any of the other approaching drivers?
No!
Call the police?
No!
They got out their videophones and recorded the whole thing for YouTube.
The evening began in unassuming fashion, but turned rapidly surreal as we watched a woman dressed in a leopard skin outfit drive a disabled cart determinedly across the road towards a waiting taxi. It seemed a dangerous manoeuvre, it being dark, the cart having no lights, and the road outside The Bar - passing as it does over the railway - being effectively on the brow of a hill. Still, she made it alright, and the taxi driver got out to help her into the cab (or so we thought), so we turned back to our drinks and our conversations expecting that to be the end of it.
How wrong we were.
A few minutes later, someone called out "oh my God! Look at her!" Far from alighting the cab and leaving, the woman was now holding up the traffic. Facing the cart the wrong way down our side of the road, she drove it from side to side in a kind of mad, figure-of-eight dance, narrowly missing the headlights of the first car in a queue of about ten that she was preventing from making any progress down the road.
The cab driver decided he didn't want to know, did a U-ey and headed back into Chorlton centre.
That was the start of an interesting half-hour during which this lady, who was clearly inebriated, high, mentally disturbed or a combination of all three, drove maniacally around on the open road, or the pavements, alternately stopping vehicular or pedestrian traffic. When, eventually, a man intervened to try and steer the cart to safety, she beat him around the head, and then got out of the cart and chased him down the road!
So. Not disabled then. No. It wasn't even a real disabled buggy. When it passed us at close range we realised it was a disabled person's shopping trolley, the "Asda" emblem clearly visible on the side. As the nearest Asda is in Hulme she'd done pretty well to navigate the thing from there to here, especially in her... incapacitated... state.
Eventually someone called the police, but they didn't seem especially interested in her or her behaviour. Not the theft of the trolley or the multiple traffic offences she must have committed, or even any kind of breach of the peace (she'd had minor altercations with several bystanders by this point).
But the most surprising and disturbing thing of all, for me, was the reaction of the overwhelming majority of onlookers.
Did they try to help her?
No!
Protect her?
No!
Warn any of the other approaching drivers?
No!
Call the police?
No!
They got out their videophones and recorded the whole thing for YouTube.
Wednesday, June 09, 2010
Why Aye
Those "cherished" number plates - we keep spotting them. Not as many, probably, as you'd see around Kensington High Street or other such places where the streets are paved with two-pound coins, but enough for the occasional blog post ;o)
Last week, it was the turn of W1 EYE, which we could only interpret as the famous Geordie greeting "why aye!" We tried various online searches to work out how much a plate like that would be worth, but all of them asked, at least, for a declaration that we owned the plate or had the permission of the owner, and in some cases we would have had to sign up and give them an arm, a leg, and our inside leg measurements before they'd let such sensitive information loose. Tch!
Near as we could tell though, with similar but not *quite* so legible plates going for around the £400 mark, is that it would be worth about five hundred. It wasn't on a particularly stand-out motor. Occasionally we see what must be a very valuable plate on a totally mundane car, which looks quite incongruous.
All of this made me wonder: if you had a budget of £50,000, would you spend it all on a snazzy motor with a regular registration, or would you spend £20,000 on a reasonable car and £30,000 on a really unusual plate? Where would your dividing line be?
Years ago, I registered my interest in a cherished plate that was, at the time, unavailable. As far as I can tell it still is, since they've never contacted me to see if I'm still interested. I quite fancied driving around behind D16 GER, but I wouldn't part with more than a couple of hundred quid for it, and I suspect I'd be in a very long queue if it ever came up.
Last week, it was the turn of W1 EYE, which we could only interpret as the famous Geordie greeting "why aye!" We tried various online searches to work out how much a plate like that would be worth, but all of them asked, at least, for a declaration that we owned the plate or had the permission of the owner, and in some cases we would have had to sign up and give them an arm, a leg, and our inside leg measurements before they'd let such sensitive information loose. Tch!
Near as we could tell though, with similar but not *quite* so legible plates going for around the £400 mark, is that it would be worth about five hundred. It wasn't on a particularly stand-out motor. Occasionally we see what must be a very valuable plate on a totally mundane car, which looks quite incongruous.
All of this made me wonder: if you had a budget of £50,000, would you spend it all on a snazzy motor with a regular registration, or would you spend £20,000 on a reasonable car and £30,000 on a really unusual plate? Where would your dividing line be?
Years ago, I registered my interest in a cherished plate that was, at the time, unavailable. As far as I can tell it still is, since they've never contacted me to see if I'm still interested. I quite fancied driving around behind D16 GER, but I wouldn't part with more than a couple of hundred quid for it, and I suspect I'd be in a very long queue if it ever came up.
Tuesday, June 08, 2010
Water, water, everywhere...
Here we go again. A drier spring than usual has led to reservoir levels being 15% down on the average for this time of year, and we're already getting water companies warning of hosepipe bans and giving us advice on how to save water.
Apparently leaving the tap running while you're cleaning your teeth wastes 7 litres. Imagine that! And then imagine the fact that United Utilities (previously Northwest Water) wastes considerably more each day through leaks. And when I say considerably more, I mean orders of magnitude more. I mean 460 million litres. Per day. "Chief Reporter" Dave Guest pointed this out to the water authority stooge on the telly last week and got the same old reply. We have an ongoing programme of leak control in place. Yeah, and you've been saying that for the last ten years to my certain knowledge. After ten years of "ongoing" leak control, you're still losing 460 million litres a day. How bad was it when you started, ferchrissake?
It's a total disgrace that water companies up and down the country are STILL allowed to sit on miles of old, dodgy, perforated piping and yet declare "profits" every year. Profits that come from ordinary households paying over the odds for their water supplies, only to be told to cut their usage in times of drought. Not even drought, actually. It's been raining on and off for weeks. There is no drought. If this is a drought God help us if it ever gets as "bad" as the oft-quoted summer of 1976 when we went 10 weeks without any rain at all.
Let's do the maths together. If you wanted, through the simple expedient of not running your tap while you were cleaning your teeth, to save the water wasted by our local water company in a single day, it would take over 65 million people changing their behaviour to do it. The entire population of the UK. And then what could we all do to save the wastage by Southern Water? And Severn Trent Water? And Thames Water? And Yorkshire Water? There are 20 water companies serving the UK. 20 companies pissing our expensive, treated, potable water out of their pipes and back into the lakes, rivers and streams, and all the while shelling out the money we've paid them to supply our water, to their shareholders, as "profit."
You couldn't make it up.
Apparently leaving the tap running while you're cleaning your teeth wastes 7 litres. Imagine that! And then imagine the fact that United Utilities (previously Northwest Water) wastes considerably more each day through leaks. And when I say considerably more, I mean orders of magnitude more. I mean 460 million litres. Per day. "Chief Reporter" Dave Guest pointed this out to the water authority stooge on the telly last week and got the same old reply. We have an ongoing programme of leak control in place. Yeah, and you've been saying that for the last ten years to my certain knowledge. After ten years of "ongoing" leak control, you're still losing 460 million litres a day. How bad was it when you started, ferchrissake?
It's a total disgrace that water companies up and down the country are STILL allowed to sit on miles of old, dodgy, perforated piping and yet declare "profits" every year. Profits that come from ordinary households paying over the odds for their water supplies, only to be told to cut their usage in times of drought. Not even drought, actually. It's been raining on and off for weeks. There is no drought. If this is a drought God help us if it ever gets as "bad" as the oft-quoted summer of 1976 when we went 10 weeks without any rain at all.
Let's do the maths together. If you wanted, through the simple expedient of not running your tap while you were cleaning your teeth, to save the water wasted by our local water company in a single day, it would take over 65 million people changing their behaviour to do it. The entire population of the UK. And then what could we all do to save the wastage by Southern Water? And Severn Trent Water? And Thames Water? And Yorkshire Water? There are 20 water companies serving the UK. 20 companies pissing our expensive, treated, potable water out of their pipes and back into the lakes, rivers and streams, and all the while shelling out the money we've paid them to supply our water, to their shareholders, as "profit."
You couldn't make it up.
Monday, June 07, 2010
Comic timing
We've been trying to sort out the pressing of physical CDs for Weird & Wonderful for months. The cover art for the front was, as regular readers will know, put to bed months ago, the photo for the inside front cover was in the bag in March, so what's really been holding us up was the back cover or, more precisely, the permission to use one of the two photos I'd found on t'Internet.
Permission for the first of the two was granted almost as soon as I asked, but the owners of the second were, shall we say, slightly more "legal" about the whole process, requiring a signed contract for limited use to be exchanged (by fax) and taking several months to even decide that approach was acceptable. Still, to give them their due, they did eventually come through and I was able to place an order for 100 CDs a couple of weeks back.
We had wanted them to be available for sale at the hotpot, but it seemed unlikely that hope would materialise, as the original delivery estimate was for June 10 and that didn't take account of international shipping. Sure enough hotpot came and went, with no sign of the discs.
They arrived in this morning's post.
Permission for the first of the two was granted almost as soon as I asked, but the owners of the second were, shall we say, slightly more "legal" about the whole process, requiring a signed contract for limited use to be exchanged (by fax) and taking several months to even decide that approach was acceptable. Still, to give them their due, they did eventually come through and I was able to place an order for 100 CDs a couple of weeks back.
We had wanted them to be available for sale at the hotpot, but it seemed unlikely that hope would materialise, as the original delivery estimate was for June 10 and that didn't take account of international shipping. Sure enough hotpot came and went, with no sign of the discs.
They arrived in this morning's post.
Sunday, June 06, 2010
Pimp My Hotpot: Final Night & BBQ 2010
A pretty hectic day for me yesterday, as the final night of the Hotpot show clashed with the annual street barbecue. So it was up with the lark to prepare the usual salads (always such a popular item I'd been asked to make the same three for the third year running), cut the new neighbour's grass (she moves in soon and it was looking like a bit of a jungle out there), and pull the garden chairs out from the depths of the shed.
BBQ started around 3pm and for once - unlike the last two years - the day was glorious. We'd had fabulous weather last weekend and the forecast in the early part of the week suggested we were in for a repeat of last year, missing the good weather by a week and being subjected to a downpour. Instead the bad weather slipped back a day and left us smiling under the sun while chomping on our toasties.
I should give the toasties a special mention this year, as it may well be the last year we enjoy them. Torsten & Keeth are set to emigrate to Portugal by the end of the summer, and their special contribution to every year's barbie will be greatly missed. Someone was supposed to watch the assembly of these delights this year so the tradition could be handed on, but no-one turned up and now they might be lost forever. I think I'll be popping down the road sometime soon with paper and pen. A street barbecue without toasties is unthinkable.
At 6.30pm, in the middle of the first quiz, I had to duck out, change into (one of) my stage costume(s) and drive over to the hall in preparation to open the final show. Even though I knew I had that monologue in my head, I didn't want to be blasé about it, and still repeated it to myself a couple of times before taking the stage. It all went very smoothly (although a slightly smaller audience than last night owing to the good weather) and pretty soon I was changing out of my tux into the black jeans and T I've been wearing all week for Beresford & Wallace's interval set.
On balance I think our performance last night was the best of the three. Not surprising, I guess, as it was the one we'd had most practice for, and I think we both (or all three of us if we include our guest artiste Becky Hodges who played a flute accompaniment to More Than Just Your Face) felt totally comfortable with both the material and the performing of it. But although it may have been technically the best performance I didn't enjoy it quite as much, both on account of knowing it was the last one, and because Nikki, Nat & Blythe weren't there as they'd been the night before. We did have a couple of friends in the audience, but it wasn't the same.
Coming off stage around 9pm I grabbed my other costume and headed back to the street BBQ, where the Chocolate Game had just finished and people were once again sitting around chatting. We had a very short gentle shower which caused us to move the chairs into a quadrangle under the gazebo, where we lit candles and enjoyed a couple of rounds of the Story Game (everyone in turn says a sentence to carry the story on) and Mafia (rules too complicated to relate but can be found here for anyone interested - although we didn't include the Nurse role mentioned there.) before moving inside, when the rain became more persistent, for another round of Mafia and more drinking (!)
Shortly after midnight most of the family had had enough so we left the remaining dozen or so revellers to their fate and wandered over the road. I picked up some more beer and headed off to the after-show party (another barbecue!) at Annie's - luckily only a short walk away. The rain had, mercifully, passed off a couple of hours before, leaving the night fresh and warm, and I spent a pleasant couple of hours munching on more BBQ food, sipping on a couple of ales and chatting with fellow members of cast & crew. It was also the first (and probably only) time I got to enjoy the Aftershow Awards ceremony that is a Chorlton Players tradition. Great fun. When I got home shortly after 3 I was more than ready to crash, even though dawn was already faintly visible over the roofs of the houses.
BBQ started around 3pm and for once - unlike the last two years - the day was glorious. We'd had fabulous weather last weekend and the forecast in the early part of the week suggested we were in for a repeat of last year, missing the good weather by a week and being subjected to a downpour. Instead the bad weather slipped back a day and left us smiling under the sun while chomping on our toasties.
I should give the toasties a special mention this year, as it may well be the last year we enjoy them. Torsten & Keeth are set to emigrate to Portugal by the end of the summer, and their special contribution to every year's barbie will be greatly missed. Someone was supposed to watch the assembly of these delights this year so the tradition could be handed on, but no-one turned up and now they might be lost forever. I think I'll be popping down the road sometime soon with paper and pen. A street barbecue without toasties is unthinkable.
At 6.30pm, in the middle of the first quiz, I had to duck out, change into (one of) my stage costume(s) and drive over to the hall in preparation to open the final show. Even though I knew I had that monologue in my head, I didn't want to be blasé about it, and still repeated it to myself a couple of times before taking the stage. It all went very smoothly (although a slightly smaller audience than last night owing to the good weather) and pretty soon I was changing out of my tux into the black jeans and T I've been wearing all week for Beresford & Wallace's interval set.
On balance I think our performance last night was the best of the three. Not surprising, I guess, as it was the one we'd had most practice for, and I think we both (or all three of us if we include our guest artiste Becky Hodges who played a flute accompaniment to More Than Just Your Face) felt totally comfortable with both the material and the performing of it. But although it may have been technically the best performance I didn't enjoy it quite as much, both on account of knowing it was the last one, and because Nikki, Nat & Blythe weren't there as they'd been the night before. We did have a couple of friends in the audience, but it wasn't the same.
Coming off stage around 9pm I grabbed my other costume and headed back to the street BBQ, where the Chocolate Game had just finished and people were once again sitting around chatting. We had a very short gentle shower which caused us to move the chairs into a quadrangle under the gazebo, where we lit candles and enjoyed a couple of rounds of the Story Game (everyone in turn says a sentence to carry the story on) and Mafia (rules too complicated to relate but can be found here for anyone interested - although we didn't include the Nurse role mentioned there.) before moving inside, when the rain became more persistent, for another round of Mafia and more drinking (!)
Shortly after midnight most of the family had had enough so we left the remaining dozen or so revellers to their fate and wandered over the road. I picked up some more beer and headed off to the after-show party (another barbecue!) at Annie's - luckily only a short walk away. The rain had, mercifully, passed off a couple of hours before, leaving the night fresh and warm, and I spent a pleasant couple of hours munching on more BBQ food, sipping on a couple of ales and chatting with fellow members of cast & crew. It was also the first (and probably only) time I got to enjoy the Aftershow Awards ceremony that is a Chorlton Players tradition. Great fun. When I got home shortly after 3 I was more than ready to crash, even though dawn was already faintly visible over the roofs of the houses.
Labels:
almost famous,
eating out,
friends,
neighbours,
parties,
performing,
songs
Saturday, June 05, 2010
Pimp My Hotpot: Two Down!
It's frightening how much I'm enjoying this - and last night was the best yet. What made it so special was having family and friends in the audience. As I said to Natalie on the way back to the car - it's a kind of payback for all the wonderful concerts I've been to over the years when she's been performing. I think I'll need a few more outings before we're all square but hey, it's a start.
I managed to join the family table for the latter half of the show before diving back to the green room to join the queue for the curtain call. Luckily myself and one of my fellow compères were the penultimate cast members to take the stage, so my timing was spot on.
If anything this experience has confirmed my long-held opinion that I have absolutely no interest in treading the boards in an acting capacity. Opening the show as compère can't be called "acting" IMO. It's more like doing a presentation (only without any slides) and from day one I've found it no more nerve-racking than any presentation I give as part of my day job.
And the singing is really not that different to the karaoke I've been doing for almost ten years. Except the songs are our own, and we don't have to keep stepping off the stage to "let someone else have a go."
But having mentioned karaoke, I should just add that if it hadn't been for my past experiences, gaining confidence in singing in front of an audience, I would never, ever, have been able to step up on stage and give a performance like I did tonight. A certain person who shall remain anonymous laughed at me when she first learned I'd started singing karaoke. But say what you will, everything happens for a reason, and starting out on that path all those years ago has led me to last night - one of the most fulfilling experiences I've ever had and a buzz that can't be easily explained to anyone who hasn't done it, or matched by much else. Laugh all you like, but if I could change anything at all, I would only want to have started sooner.
I managed to join the family table for the latter half of the show before diving back to the green room to join the queue for the curtain call. Luckily myself and one of my fellow compères were the penultimate cast members to take the stage, so my timing was spot on.
If anything this experience has confirmed my long-held opinion that I have absolutely no interest in treading the boards in an acting capacity. Opening the show as compère can't be called "acting" IMO. It's more like doing a presentation (only without any slides) and from day one I've found it no more nerve-racking than any presentation I give as part of my day job.
And the singing is really not that different to the karaoke I've been doing for almost ten years. Except the songs are our own, and we don't have to keep stepping off the stage to "let someone else have a go."
But having mentioned karaoke, I should just add that if it hadn't been for my past experiences, gaining confidence in singing in front of an audience, I would never, ever, have been able to step up on stage and give a performance like I did tonight. A certain person who shall remain anonymous laughed at me when she first learned I'd started singing karaoke. But say what you will, everything happens for a reason, and starting out on that path all those years ago has led me to last night - one of the most fulfilling experiences I've ever had and a buzz that can't be easily explained to anyone who hasn't done it, or matched by much else. Laugh all you like, but if I could change anything at all, I would only want to have started sooner.
Friday, June 04, 2010
Pimp My Hotpot: Opening Night
So, what was it like for you?
In the end, I was nowhere near as nervous as I expected to be, but on reflection that probably has something to do with confidence that I knew my lines, the fact that there were only 2 minutes-worth rather than a whole play, and that it wasn't *really* acting. Being a compère is more like doing a presentation, which is something I've done dozens of times, to much bigger audiences.
So that part went pretty well. Got a few laughs, even. The worst part was the heat. I picked a really bad night to be wearing a tuxedo and bow tie. Later there was a brief panic when we thought we'd lost the laptop with our music on it, and then I was nearly killed by falling scenery while we set up the mikes for our interval slot. The movable wall, used in the previous sketch, was in a slightly different position than it had been at dress rehearsal. As the half-tab curtains were pulled across the stage they caught it and toppled it over.
Luckily I spotted it out of the corner of my eye in time to move out from under it, but it was a peripheral vision test I could have done without at that particular moment.
As predicted the audience were preoccupied with conversation, and getting on the outside of their food, during most of the first number, but we were pleased that they soon realised we were worth listening too, and by the middle of the second number we had everyone's attention. I don't think the sound of my stomach reacting to the smell of chilli as it wafted onto stage was audible over the singing.
And then, suddenly, it was over. First night was behind us. In the bag. A success, albeit with a pitifully small audience (on account of the good weather, we decided, along with the fact that the local paper let us down and didn't include our press release in last week's edition).
The post-show beers have never tasted so good.
In the end, I was nowhere near as nervous as I expected to be, but on reflection that probably has something to do with confidence that I knew my lines, the fact that there were only 2 minutes-worth rather than a whole play, and that it wasn't *really* acting. Being a compère is more like doing a presentation, which is something I've done dozens of times, to much bigger audiences.
So that part went pretty well. Got a few laughs, even. The worst part was the heat. I picked a really bad night to be wearing a tuxedo and bow tie. Later there was a brief panic when we thought we'd lost the laptop with our music on it, and then I was nearly killed by falling scenery while we set up the mikes for our interval slot. The movable wall, used in the previous sketch, was in a slightly different position than it had been at dress rehearsal. As the half-tab curtains were pulled across the stage they caught it and toppled it over.
Luckily I spotted it out of the corner of my eye in time to move out from under it, but it was a peripheral vision test I could have done without at that particular moment.
As predicted the audience were preoccupied with conversation, and getting on the outside of their food, during most of the first number, but we were pleased that they soon realised we were worth listening too, and by the middle of the second number we had everyone's attention. I don't think the sound of my stomach reacting to the smell of chilli as it wafted onto stage was audible over the singing.
And then, suddenly, it was over. First night was behind us. In the bag. A success, albeit with a pitifully small audience (on account of the good weather, we decided, along with the fact that the local paper let us down and didn't include our press release in last week's edition).
The post-show beers have never tasted so good.
Thursday, June 03, 2010
Pimp My Hotpot: Dress Rehearsal
There's many a slip twixt cup and lip, but if last night's dress rehearsal is anything to go by, tonight's 'opening night' show should be a corker. Even when I was singing on a weekly basis I've never felt as comfortable on a stage as I did last night. Admittedly, I was singing my own material, and there wasn't much of an audience to speak of (a few other cast members and the crew), but even so I had a blast. Hopefully my familiarity with the songs and the venue will help overcome any nerves that are bound to crop up when I'm faced with a real, live audience. If the singing accountant can use his nerves to focus his singing, I'm sure I can. He's balder than I.
As far as "the other" part of my involvement goes - the first-act compère - I've developed a delivery style that gives me lots of pauses to let the memory flow. At the outset I thought I'd bitten off more than I could chew, having written a 2-minute (or so) monologue in the style of Leonard Sachs (in his The Good Old Days persona) I ended up packing it with so much polysyllabic alliteration that I thought I'd never be able to memorise it. However, perseverance has paid off and - so far at least - I've been pretty close to word perfect at most rehearsals, and bang on last night.
That's not stopped me from engaging in more practice today though. I'm all too conscious that I could go blank at any moment, so I need those six paragraphs fresh and at the forefront of my mind until Saturday.
I wrote "the other" part of my involvement above, but of course there's one more role that I traditionally perform on dress rehearsal night: the taking of the production photos. This proved physically impossible for those parts of the night where I was in front of the camera, so I was grateful to have a deputy to take over for the ~25 minutes when I was on stage or in the stalls. Most of the photos are available already. The ones of the "Hurly Burly Burlesque Queens" are awaiting vetting by the Queens themselves. When you're dancing it what is essentially underwear, it's only fair to have a veto over what images are made public!
As far as "the other" part of my involvement goes - the first-act compère - I've developed a delivery style that gives me lots of pauses to let the memory flow. At the outset I thought I'd bitten off more than I could chew, having written a 2-minute (or so) monologue in the style of Leonard Sachs (in his The Good Old Days persona) I ended up packing it with so much polysyllabic alliteration that I thought I'd never be able to memorise it. However, perseverance has paid off and - so far at least - I've been pretty close to word perfect at most rehearsals, and bang on last night.
That's not stopped me from engaging in more practice today though. I'm all too conscious that I could go blank at any moment, so I need those six paragraphs fresh and at the forefront of my mind until Saturday.
I wrote "the other" part of my involvement above, but of course there's one more role that I traditionally perform on dress rehearsal night: the taking of the production photos. This proved physically impossible for those parts of the night where I was in front of the camera, so I was grateful to have a deputy to take over for the ~25 minutes when I was on stage or in the stalls. Most of the photos are available already. The ones of the "Hurly Burly Burlesque Queens" are awaiting vetting by the Queens themselves. When you're dancing it what is essentially underwear, it's only fair to have a veto over what images are made public!
Wednesday, June 02, 2010
Reality check
The dust has settled after Monday morning's revelation of the UKSC results for 2010, and - with the help of a distant friend from the Pacific Northwest - I've gained some perspective.
Give myself some credit, she wisely wrote: it wasn't so very long ago that I hadn't written a song in my entire life. True, that. And now I've co-written not one but two songs which have received the accolade of being "good songs that almost made the semi-final" in one of the most prestigious songwriting competitions in the world. So yes, maybe that's not so bad after all.
I've been thinking a lot today about the source of my reaction to bad - or should I say "not glowing" - criticism. I've decided it comes from a long way back, from the time when my mother used to tell me "don't be an also-ran, John." Unfortunately her parenting skills only stretched as far as sharing aphorisms like that with me. Never look a gift horse in the mouth, neither a borrower nor a lender be, you know the kind of thing. While she was off congratulating herself on what a good job she was doing bringing me up, I was left to wonder (a) what an also-ran was - I was very young at the time - and (b) how to avoid being one.
What she meant, I soon realised, was that she wanted me to be a winner. What she wasn't able to do much of was give me, or help me find, the skills to become one. I was on my own with that one. And what she clearly was never able to grasp is that there's one thing worse than being an also-ran, and that is to never run at all. Which is what most people do, and, to a very great extent, what she herself has done. At least we *entered* the contest in the first place. We set ourselves up to be measured. We ran the race. And if it wasn't for "also-rans," there wouldn't be a race to win.
So thanks Mum, but I'll take also-ran for now. In fact I'll revel in it. And while we're at it, if I wasn't a borrower I wouldn't have a house to live in, and not checking those gift horses' mouths just gives people free rein (see what I did there?) to dump a load of old tat on you.
I'll let you know when I think of one of those hackneyed old parental phrases that was worth listening to.
Give myself some credit, she wisely wrote: it wasn't so very long ago that I hadn't written a song in my entire life. True, that. And now I've co-written not one but two songs which have received the accolade of being "good songs that almost made the semi-final" in one of the most prestigious songwriting competitions in the world. So yes, maybe that's not so bad after all.
I've been thinking a lot today about the source of my reaction to bad - or should I say "not glowing" - criticism. I've decided it comes from a long way back, from the time when my mother used to tell me "don't be an also-ran, John." Unfortunately her parenting skills only stretched as far as sharing aphorisms like that with me. Never look a gift horse in the mouth, neither a borrower nor a lender be, you know the kind of thing. While she was off congratulating herself on what a good job she was doing bringing me up, I was left to wonder (a) what an also-ran was - I was very young at the time - and (b) how to avoid being one.
What she meant, I soon realised, was that she wanted me to be a winner. What she wasn't able to do much of was give me, or help me find, the skills to become one. I was on my own with that one. And what she clearly was never able to grasp is that there's one thing worse than being an also-ran, and that is to never run at all. Which is what most people do, and, to a very great extent, what she herself has done. At least we *entered* the contest in the first place. We set ourselves up to be measured. We ran the race. And if it wasn't for "also-rans," there wouldn't be a race to win.
So thanks Mum, but I'll take also-ran for now. In fact I'll revel in it. And while we're at it, if I wasn't a borrower I wouldn't have a house to live in, and not checking those gift horses' mouths just gives people free rein (see what I did there?) to dump a load of old tat on you.
I'll let you know when I think of one of those hackneyed old parental phrases that was worth listening to.
Tuesday, June 01, 2010
UK Songwriting Contest results
The results of the 2010 UK Songwriting Contest were posted early yesterday morning.
We had two songs in the competition - Spin Doctor and More Than Just Your Face - in the "Pop" category. Deciding on the category to enter was almost half the battle, since most of our music straddles the divide between folk and pop, with occasionally a bit of (very) light rock thrown in. Still, we figured Pop was close enough, and any claim to be entirely folk may have been met with derision on the part of the judges.
This did, unfortunately, put us into the fiery pit of hell as far as competition was concerned, as "pop" is probably the most oversubscribed category in the whole thing. This year there were over 5,000 entries in the overall competition, and judges commented that they had all been much stronger entries than in previous years.
So, I guess, on balance, with that level of competition and given that it was our first attempt, we should be fairly pleased with the results. Both our entries received a "Commended Entry" Certificate, and both received scores of 5. The scoring is explained on the UKSC website like this:
"A score of 4 or 5 indicates that this is a good song and it will receive a Commended Entry Certificate. A score of 5 indicates that the song very nearly made the semi finals. All songs with a score of 4 and 5 are considered for the semi finals."....
At the moment I'm still flipping between being happy that we did as well as that (and that we even bothered to enter, which I guess is something), and disappointment that we didn't make the semis. Being able to badge our songs "UKSC Semi-finalist" would have been really something. Commended doesn't have anywhere near that same cachet. But I always was my own worst critic. Some people would put the maximum possible positive spin on this, whereas I'm struggling to see it as anything other than another comment that my work is good, but not quite good enough.
We had two songs in the competition - Spin Doctor and More Than Just Your Face - in the "Pop" category. Deciding on the category to enter was almost half the battle, since most of our music straddles the divide between folk and pop, with occasionally a bit of (very) light rock thrown in. Still, we figured Pop was close enough, and any claim to be entirely folk may have been met with derision on the part of the judges.
This did, unfortunately, put us into the fiery pit of hell as far as competition was concerned, as "pop" is probably the most oversubscribed category in the whole thing. This year there were over 5,000 entries in the overall competition, and judges commented that they had all been much stronger entries than in previous years.
So, I guess, on balance, with that level of competition and given that it was our first attempt, we should be fairly pleased with the results. Both our entries received a "Commended Entry" Certificate, and both received scores of 5. The scoring is explained on the UKSC website like this:
"A score of 4 or 5 indicates that this is a good song and it will receive a Commended Entry Certificate. A score of 5 indicates that the song very nearly made the semi finals. All songs with a score of 4 and 5 are considered for the semi finals."....
At the moment I'm still flipping between being happy that we did as well as that (and that we even bothered to enter, which I guess is something), and disappointment that we didn't make the semis. Being able to badge our songs "UKSC Semi-finalist" would have been really something. Commended doesn't have anywhere near that same cachet. But I always was my own worst critic. Some people would put the maximum possible positive spin on this, whereas I'm struggling to see it as anything other than another comment that my work is good, but not quite good enough.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)